The Hon’ble Supreme Court of India held that an authorized signatory of the company could not be considered as a 'drawer' of cheque, and therefore, could not be directed to pay the interim compensation to the complainant under Section 143A of the Negotiable Instruments Act...
HIGH COURT OF KERALA Satish Motilal Bidri…………Petitioner Vs. Union of India. through Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Jeevan Deep Building, Parliament Street & Ors………….Respondents Bechu Kurian Thomas, J. Decided on : 28/06/2024 Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 Section 5—Proceeds of crime—Types of—There are three types...
HIGH COURT OF DELHI Rakesh Yadav & Ors………….Petitioners Vs. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr………….Respondents Ms. Swarana Kanta Sharma, J. Decided on : 01/07/2024 Indian Penal Code, 1860 Sections 376, 377, 323, 509, 34 & 380—Rape—Petition to quash FIR on ground of compromise—Fact that...
HIGH COURT OF DELHI Ashok Biswas S/o Anil Biswas & Anr………….Appellants Vs. The Divisional Commissioner Department of Revenue Govt. of NCT Delhi & Ors………….Respondents Satish Chandra Sharma, Chief Justice & Subramonium Prasad, J. Decided on : 10/04/2023 Delhi has framed Delhi Maintenance and Welfare of...
Nulla vitae elit libero, a pharetra augue. Nulla vitae elit libero, a pharetra augue. Nulla vitae elit libero, a pharetra augue. Donec sed odio dui. Etiam porta sem malesuada.
Recent Comments