Blog Full Left Sidebar With Frame

Company’s Authorized Signatory Not ‘Drawer’ Of Cheque, Can’t Be Directed To Pay Interim Compensation:

The Hon’ble Supreme Court of India held that an authorized signatory of the company could not be considered as a 'drawer' of cheque, and therefore, could not be directed to pay the interim compensation to the complainant under...

•July 26, 2024•Harish Bajaj•Cheque, Negotiable Instrument•No comments

Proceeds of crime under Section 5 of PMLA Act

HIGH COURT OF KERALA Satish Motilal Bidri…………Petitioner Vs. Union of India. through Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Jeevan Deep Building, Parliament Street & Ors………….Respondents Bechu Kurian Thomas, J. Decided on : 28/06/2024 Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 Section...

•July 26, 2024•Harish Bajaj•No comments

Bail Order Shouldn’t Be Normally Stayed During Pendency Of Application To Cancel Bail : Supreme Court

In an important judgment, the Hon’ble Supreme Court on Tuesday (July 23) held that bail orders should not be normally stayed.

•July 24, 2024•Harish Bajaj•No comments

Even if the parties have reached a compromise, they cannot demand the quashing of an FIR as a matter of right

HIGH COURT OF DELHI Rakesh Yadav & Ors………….Petitioners Vs. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr………….Respondents Ms. Swarana Kanta Sharma, J. Decided on : 01/07/2024 Indian Penal Code, 1860 Sections 376, 377, 323, 509, 34 & 380—Rape—Petition to...

•July 14, 2024•Harish Bajaj•No comments

Injunction which only protects the appellants from being ejected without following due process of law cannot survive in view of Rule 22 of the Delhi Rules read with Senior Citizens Act—Judgment of Single Judge warrants no interference

HIGH COURT OF DELHI Ashok Biswas S/o Anil Biswas & Anr………….Appellants Vs. The Divisional Commissioner Department of Revenue Govt. of NCT Delhi & Ors………….Respondents Satish Chandra Sharma, Chief Justice & Subramonium Prasad, J. Decided on : 10/04/2023 Delhi...

•July 11, 2024•Harish Bajaj•No comments

1 … 48 49 50 51 52