In the above mentioned case, the High Court had compounded the offence, even though the appellants/ complainant had not consented, by invoking its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. Distinguishing these two sections, the Bench of Justices CT Ravikumar and Sanjay Karol observed
The case originates from an Agreement to Sell dated June 29, 2020, between the appellants and complainant for the sale of a property in Rajgarh, Rajasthan for Rs. 5.11 crores.
Rule 24(4)—Disqualification for appointment for police constable post on ground that appellant had more than two children—Appeal—Recruitment is governed by the Rajasthan Police Subordinate Service
The bench of Justices Hrishikesh Roy and SVN Bhatti was hearing the PIL filed by a petitioner-in-person Dr SN Kundra who had challenged the constitutional validity of Articles 52, 53, 75(4), 77, 102(2), 164(3), 191(2), 246, 361, and 368 of the Constitution of India unconstitutional. Additionally, the...
