The Hon’ble Supreme Court of India held that an authorized signatory of the company could not be considered as a 'drawer' of cheque, and therefore, could not be directed to pay the interim compensation to the complainant under...
HIGH COURT OF KERALA Satish Motilal Bidri…………Petitioner Vs. Union of India. through Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Jeevan Deep Building, Parliament Street & Ors………….Respondents Bechu Kurian Thomas, J. Decided on : 28/06/2024 Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 Section...
The constitution of India under Article 21 guarantees right to life and liberty as a fundamental Right , Article 21 states , No person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to procedure established...
HIGH COURT OF DELHI Rakesh Yadav & Ors………….Petitioners Vs. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr………….Respondents Ms. Swarana Kanta Sharma, J. Decided on : 01/07/2024 Indian Penal Code, 1860 Sections 376, 377, 323, 509, 34 & 380—Rape—Petition to...
